'Compliance by design': the article proposing that Legal be involved from the design stage of AI systems
An article published in Actualidad Jurídica Aranzadi argues that the adoption of artificial intelligence in organizations requires reviewing not only the technology but also how decisions about it are made. Against the model in which compliance validates at the end, 'compliance by design' proposes that Legal and Compliance take part from the moment a use case is conceived, working with business, IT, data and cybersecurity teams to turn legal obligations into design decisions.
In 40 seconds
- The article argues that many decisions determining a system's legal risk are made during design: purpose, data, autonomy, traceability or vendor.
- 'Compliance by design' proposes that Legal and Compliance join from the conception of the use case, not before going into production.
- The text links this approach to the risk-based logic of the AI Regulation, the GDPR and DORA in the financial sector.
IASummary generated by artificial intelligence from a story by Legal Today. It may contain errors: the original source prevails.





Comments
Be respectful. Comments reported by several people are hidden until a moderator reviews them.
You do not need an account to read, only to comment. Sign in with a code sent to your email or with your Google account. We only show the name you choose, never your email.