Chile's Supreme Court sets 13 principles for AI use in courts and requires human decisions
Supreme Court President Gloria Ana Chevesich presented the full court's definitions on the ethical and functional regulation of artificial intelligence in the courts. The instrument enshrines 13 guiding principles, including fundamental rights and non-discrimination, human oversight, explainability, transparency, proportionality and judicial independence. The court established that AI is only a support tool: jurisdictional decisions rest exclusively with judges, and misuse of these tools can lead to disciplinary liability.
In 40 seconds
- Chile's Supreme Court enshrines 13 guiding principles for the design, development and use of AI in the judiciary.
- AI may only assist with preparatory or support tasks; evidence assessment and the decision remain with the court.
- Misuse of AI can lead to disciplinary liability, handled by the respective Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court itself depending on the case.
IASummary generated by artificial intelligence from a story by BioBioChile. It may contain errors: the original source prevails.




Comments
Be respectful. Comments reported by several people are hidden until a moderator reviews them.
You do not need an account to read, only to comment. Sign in with a code sent to your email or with your Google account. We only show the name you choose, never your email.