Lawyer warns AI must undergo legal review before being used in cases
At the Third Derecho Prudente Conference, held at the Pepe Vives Campo Theater of Cajamag in Santa Marta, lawyer and education PhD Alexander Obando Sánchez explained how artificial intelligence can support legal work: organizing sources, synthesizing information, contrasting arguments and identifying gaps in legal analyses. He argued that the outputs of these tools must undergo legal review before being used in consultations, case theories or court proceedings, and that responsibility for errors cannot be shifted to AI.
In 35 seconds
- AI can support the organization of sources, information synthesis and the contrasting of legal arguments.
- Obando insisted that AI outputs must go through legal review before being used in consultations or court proceedings.
- The speaker warned that responsibility for possible errors cannot be shifted to artificial intelligence.
IASummary generated by artificial intelligence from a story by El Informador. It may contain errors: the original source prevails.





Comments
Be respectful. Comments reported by several people are hidden until a moderator reviews them.
You do not need an account to read, only to comment. Sign in with a code sent to your email or with your Google account. We only show the name you choose, never your email.